Which statement about the levels of risk approval is incorrect?

Which statement about the levels of risk approval is incorrect?

• A. Low - Senior Commander
• B. Moderate - Major or Lieutenant Colonel
• C. High - Colonel or equivalent
• D. Extremely High - Senior Commander of general officer grade

Answer: (B)

The main idea is how risk approval authority scales with the level of risk. As risk grows, the approving authority must be higher in rank. Extremely high risk requires a general officer; high risk sits with a colonel-level authority; and low risk is handled at the lowest practical level. Moderate risk, sitting in the middle, is typically approved at a battalion-level, which is commanded by a Lieutenant Colonel. Including Major in that bracket isn’t correct because a Major is generally a staff officer and not the designated approving authority for moderate-risk decisions on most policies. So the statement tying moderate risk to Major or Lieutenant Colonel isn’t aligned with how the approval levels are usually assigned.

The main idea is how risk approval authority scales with the level of risk. As risk grows, the approving authority must be higher in rank. Extremely high risk requires a general officer; high risk sits with a colonel-level authority; and low risk is handled at the lowest practical level. Moderate risk, sitting in the middle, is typically approved at a battalion-level, which is commanded by a Lieutenant Colonel. Including Major in that bracket isn’t correct because a Major is generally a staff officer and not the designated approving authority for moderate-risk decisions on most policies. So the statement tying moderate risk to Major or Lieutenant Colonel isn’t aligned with how the approval levels are usually assigned.